The exploits of Freelancer.com

Stilgherrian

It’s a fine line between reducing labour costs through international outsourcing and exploitation. Earlier this month Australia’s Freelancer.com, the darling of employment websites, sped straight across that line to join the bottom-feeders. What were they thinking?

Online labour marketplaces – sites that link businesses with the growing global digital workforce – are nothing new. oDesk dates from 2003, vWorker from 2002, Elance from way back in 1999. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, which provides tools for hiring pieceworkers for tasks as tiny as deciding whether a single photo is adult content or translating a single sentence from one language to another, was launched in 2005. CrowdFlower, providing tools to manage Mechanical Turk tasks, came in 2007.

Nor are they particularly controversial. Apart from oDesk’s habit of recording screenshots of what’s on workers’ computers or even webcam shots, and a study which showed that around 40 per cent of the work on Mechanical Turk supports spammers, the main targets of criticism are crowdsourcing sites like Melbourne-based 99designs.

Launched in 2008, 99designs uses a competition model. Want a logo for your business card? A hundred hopefuls, probably more, will compete for your prize of $200 or more. You only pay the winner. Everyone else is working for you, generating designs for your consideration, sometimes even producing revisions following your feedback, for precisely nothing.

Meanwhile SitePoint, which owns 99designs, has scored an investment of $35 million. Investors clearly support the idea of unpaid labour. I’ll admit I find it difficult to disguise my disgust.

Until now Freelancer.com, the leader of the pack, has avoided this sort of controversy.

Founded in Sweden in 2004 as GetAFreelancer.com, the site was bought by Australia’s Ignition Networks in 2009, re-named, and it now boasts 2.6 million workers on file and more than a million projects completed. It has made a tidy $85 million in commissions and earned CEO Matt Barrie the title “Entrepreneur of the Year” from BRW magazine and this year’s Webby Award for “Employment Site of the Year”.

While the top project categories are predictable – web development in the PHP programming language, website design and graphic design, plus plenty of bread-and-butter work like data entry and copywriting – Barrie has been keen to emphasise the variety on offer.

“We saw one project which was ‘Help me design an algorithm to detect skin cancer’, there was a guy who wanted someone to help him design the schematics for a jetpack, and someone else wanted a 3D walk-through of a hotel done by someone with a CAD/CAM package,” he told me in April.

“We send about a million emails an hour out,” Barrie said. “Chances are just about any job you can think of now you can probably find someone on the other side of the world to do it for you.”

Barrie has also emphasised the benefits for the developing world. “Primarily what we’re about is connecting Western world individuals and small businesses with developing world labour,” he said. “Over half the jobs come from the United States, followed by UK, Canada and Australia and so forth, although interestingly enough India is the third-largest outsourcer of jobs on the site.”

The workers come primarily from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Philippines and Vietnam, says Barrie.

(That could be set to change. It’s been two years since I was told that Kenya had the potential to become Africa’s call centre capital. India was just starting to price itself out of the market as workers’ expectations rose, and the TEAMS and SEACOM cables were just lighting up to provide East Africa with its first decent internet access.)

“If you’re in Bangladesh and you’re [a] search engine optimisation specialist, life is pretty grim. You might be on $2 or $3 or $4 a day, right? But now you can jump online and potentially earn a month’s wage in a matter of hours or days etc by freelancing,” Barrie said. He tells some good rags-to-riches yarns.

But all that has changed. On 6 June, Freelancer.com announced that it had joined the crowdsourcers, launching what they claim to be “the biggest and most lucrative logo crowdsourcing site in the world”.

“What does this mean for 99designs, DesignCrowd and other niche crowdsourcing companies? Especially when considered in the context of Accel’s recent $35 million investment in 99designs?” asked Freelancer.com’s publicist. “Are niche players doomed to fail as the majors move in with tailored vertical offerings?

“The two contests we currently have running on the platform have already received over 6000 submissions, and it’s only been a week!” said Barrie.

It’s all a little unsavoury. Explicitly naming the competitors you intend to crush is one thing. Pride that more than 5999 people won’t be paid a cent for their work is quite another.

 

 

Have your say

To comment, please sign in using your social network account.
Or use a standard username and password.
Gadget Opia

@Nicole Miller,

No, I would not like to retract my "personal attack" on Mr Stilsocialist.

Also, I'm very disappointed to discover that you think any attempt by me to get a few quotes from whichever category of worker I choose to do business with is me "exploiting" those workers.

What do you do, take the first quote that comes around? Please stop misrepresenting the way business works - and that goes for you too, Mr S.

Nicole Miller

@gadget, if you're serious (which I'm beginning to doubt), I don't think you understand what crowdsourcing really is. You don't request "quotes" in crowdsourcing, you request completed items and buy the one you like. You can find an explanation at Wikipedia. You can try to understand how irrelevant it is to sites like Freelancer.com, again, here at this blog, or here: http://bit.ly/kPJMyp.

Gadget Opia

Sorry Nicole, I'm definitely 110% serious. Apparently you misunderstand capitalism. Hardly surprising, though.

Nicole Miller

@Gadget Opia,

The similarity between what you suggested and what Freelancer.com has crowdsourced is flawed. If you are looking for a plumber or a builder, and you let all of them work, but you only pay the one that did the best job, then YES, you have ripped off all those other plumbers or builders!

Perhaps you would like to retract your personal attack on 'Mr Stil' now that you understand?

Greg Hill

Economic (prospect) theory suggests that a rational worker would look at the prize ($200), the effort involved (say, 2 hours) and estimate their chances of winning (say, 1/1000) and decide if their hourly rate (say, 50c) means it's worth their while entering.

A more sophisticated version would be to estimate their effective hourly rate as a function of the prize and probability of winning (which in turn is a function of how many hours they spend on the task) and weigh that against their opportunity costs.

In any case, the only way workers are ripped off here doing "free work" is if they are mislead about their probability of winning, or at least, the number of participants.

Generally, it's the nature of business that vendors do "free work" - tenders, quotes, trials, demonstrations etc are all forms of "free work". They just have to price in to their winning quotes. Problems only arise when they assume they are salaried workers who are paid for each and every hour.

Dale Hurley

Clearly Gadget Opia (GO) feels it is fine to exploit people, GO probably already does. The problem with the idea of competitions is that people are doing a hell of a lot more work than a simple quote. In some cases they are spending days doing work for free. It also leads to the competitors doing shonky work, such as stealing other people's designs.

This is not capitalism. In no way is capitalism about working for free. You would have to be completely ignorant to think that working for free is capitalism. Actually I think the whole point of capitalism is about exchange.

GO calling Stilgherrian a socialist for saying working for free is exploitation is completely off the radar.

Seriously, where in Keynesian economics does it say that you should work for free? These models are closer to Marxism economic theories. Far out, I am so annoyed that someone could so stupidly state working for free is apart of capitalism, and that to be against this practice is socialism.

Sorry go back to Economics 101 and learn about Marxism then decide if the value labour theory is what these competitions enforce.

Actually here is the highest level simple concept of labour in:

Capitalism = The exchange of time spent doing labour for income.
Marxian = The exchange of the value of labout output for income.

Dale

Gadget Opia

C'mon Stilgherrian, you betray your anti-business tendencies with this article. No-one is forcing anyone to join Freelancer or Crowdsourcer or "work for free", as you put it. If you are looking for a plumber or a builder, and get quotes from several, but only give one the job, have you ripped off all those other plumbers or builders?

Where's the support for capitalism and the free market, one which gives you your job, Mr Stil?

I guess attacking people who are building something is much easier than actually doing something more than just writing an article.

Stilgherrian. Stilsocialist.

Welcome to Technology Spectator!

Thanks for visiting our site. So you don’t miss out on the latest tech business news and commentary make sure you register for our daily email newsletter here:
* Mandatory fields